
The earth is unhappy, but it's humans, not the sun, that's making it too hot to live on.
Back in college,
a group of us worked with local high school students to see what methods were most effective in encouraging behavior change and climate change comprehension. One of the exercises we did early on was to dispel any climate myths through a mental model exercise.
"Draw a picture of what you think causes climate change," we'd asked.
While some of the drawings included smokestacks and cars and funny squiggly arrows traveling between the sun and the earth, invariably a common element shared among the drawings were ozone holes.* That or a blank stare and an empty sheet of paper.
Many of the students I worked with came from low-income communities, with no access to grocery stores or easy public transportation. Talking to them about climate change and how important it is to ride your bike or eat healthier always ended up feeling...wrong...especially when you heard their stories (like how just last week, one of them lost a cousin to a gang shooting near their school.) Hopefully I've gotten better at making the links between climate change and local community impacts, behavior change and health since then, but it's always a work in progress.
Nevertheless, talking to these 14- and 15-year-olds about climate misconceptions overcame the misperception that climate science is too difficult to teach or understand. By the end of the course, while we may not have changed everyone's behaviors, students came away with a much better and deeper understanding of climate change. Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth also helped a bit.
Reinventing how we share science

Students in my class back at Stanford preparing lessons for their high school students. (L.A. Cicero)
Since that day, I've come to firmly believe that no scientific concept is too difficult for someone to understand. This is especially important given the latest climate misinformation and attacks on scientists by climate deniers. How do you fight their pretty pictures and skewed information? Have your own pretty pictures (and videos and stories), backed with hard evidence. Scientists and climate advocates are learning to use more metaphors and avoid academic jargon. (Maybe someday, when our science education gets the resources it deserves, people will know the difference between a theory and a hypothesis, but until then, don't say "our theory is...")
To do this, and to show that scientists are capable of talking about climate science to the general public (and should be doing more of it), NOAA and NASA have both rolled out new websites that explain the science behind climate change. NASA in particular has front-and-center a great intro video, with Avatar-age graphics and compelling images that show, among other things, the difference between weather (which climate deniers harp on) and climate change. The video talks in metaphors (water vapor is a "climate wildcard") and visually shows how NASA collects data. Climate science is not a mystery. Its impacts are felt here and worldwide. And education is key (as seen by the ever-more-frequent Educator tab on government websites).
Reframing the classroom climate discussion
This new awareness about how to talk about climate change is long overdue. In Hunter Cutting's latest blog on reframing the debate on climate science, the message is just as relevant to education as it is to the media. Here's my run-down of how his recommendations on reframing can be applied to science educators:
"The Messenger"
Just as scientists don't always make the best messengers when speaking alone, science educators need to bring in voices outside academia, so that students can relate to actual experiences and people impacted by climate change. It wasn't enough for me to talk about the impacts of climate change to my group of students. I had to connect them to farmers (like those already in their family!) who were suffering crop losses due to increasing droughts.

Tokyo's Koto Ward Government in 2008 required all elementary school fifth graders to take action to reduce GHGs at home. (Treehugger)
"The Message"
Climate advocates need to "call out the politics" behind the distorted messages of climate deniers, according to Hunter. Likewise, climate educators need to build a solid basis of understanding behind how science is done, how to sift fact from fiction and do good-ole-fashioned journalism – in essence, how to think for yourself. What is the scientific method? What's a theory and what's a hypothesis? What's the evidence? How are the climate, land and water systems linked? And how do you discover what's fact and what's not in what you read? This clearly applies to any type of science lesson, whether you're taking about watershed conservation or biodiversity.
"The Audience"
Know your audience. Where are they coming from? How much do they know about their own communities, their watersheds, their climate-related behaviors? And back to the mental model exercise, what preconceptions do they already have about climate change? Asking these questions not only engages students in the classroom, it makes the issue something in which they feel personally invested.
"The Setting"
This is similar for both speaking to a general audience through media outlets and speaking to a room full of students. Establish the current setting through images, videos and stories of how climate change impacts are happening here and now, as well as abroad. Talk about the droughts, hurricanes, and floods that are happening with increasing frequency and intensity. Start local and expand to the global. Talk about what kids their age are experiencing in Botswana, in India, in Nepal. Each person should realize at the end of the day that they are a global citizen, that they can reach out, that they can make a difference.
Do you have other ideas to share about climate education? What's worked for you (as a student or as ateacher) in the classroom and what hasn't? Log-in and share your comments below!
* The ozone hole is a whole other issue and does not cause global warming, as some people think, although the two are connected. Many ozone-depleting compounds are also greenhouse gases, for instance. But ozone depletion happens at the much higher stratosphere, while the "greenhouse gas effect" happens closer to the earth's surface.
Comments
There is noticeably a bundle
There is noticeably a bundle to find out about this. I assume you made certain good factors in features also.
Empowering our youth
Great article Katy, about an exceptionally sensitive and important topic. I agree that it is important to educate the youth of today and give them the foundation to become the climate leaders of tomorrow. However, I would just like to caution a few things. First, there is a fine line between educating students and getting them all "riled up". We certainly don't want to panic anyone. It is thus important to always balance the science and consequences with the causes and solutions - empowering students to realize that things can always be done to help, just on different spatial and temporal scales (whoops, jargon!). And my second comment is related - in addition to knowing your audience (really, good advice for most situations), I also urge educators to be careful - it does no good to make students feel personally guilty or responsible for this entire "global warming mess" just because they rode to school in their beat up old truck and enjoy eating meat every day. It is entirely too common for a serious sense of helplessness to overcome students when they are presented with too much information at once, or it is all too closely linked to their personal habits. Rather, it is extremely important to identify these as global problems that demand global solutions. Yes, each of us as individuals can take small steps towards the right path, but it will be our collective actions that make the biggest dent on our future. And that is the essence of the importance of educating our youth: the more who know, and understand, the more likely we are in the future to reach a collective solution. Right?
Absolutely right
Rivers as a Channel for Teaching Climate Change
Ditto on getting kids out to their rivers!
It is Interesting
Very interesting, I agree with your point about scientists needing to speak to a broader audience. I think in many ways this is happening -- even if it is at the expense of the traditional news media. With so many outlets for information people are more prone to bypass newspapers and television news to seek information from the source directly. Scientists who adapt to this trend will definitely see their ideas gain a more popular acceptance. Yes, Al Gore did it nicely. And so can we!
Cheers for the info
Cheers for the info. It was a good read.
Incorporate Into Many Subjects
Great ideas. Given how critical it will be for the next generation to have a good grasp on climate issues, I'd love to see teachers incorporating the issues around our changing climate and what need to do to address it into many subjects. Doesn't have to be all doom and gloom; there are good solutions to talk about (and personal efforts we all can make). Thanks for bringing up a challenging subject!