Payal Parekh's picture
Payal Parekh
Former Climate Program Director
I put my scientific training into action as a weapon in the struggle against destructive river projects. I also work to debunk the myth that dams are good for the climate. We know that dams adversely impact a river's ability to adapt to climate change and dams in tropical regions can be major emitters of methane, a greenhouse gas that is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.

Subscribe to this blog
Email the author
Categories

learn more about:

Join us!

Login/Register
Home › Climate Change › Carbon Offsets

Climate and Human Rights

Thu, 12/11/2008 - 9:55am

Banner at Protest Against AES (Dawn Jones)

Banner at Protest Against AES (Dawn Jones)

Even though local communities in vulnerable areas of the planet such as Tuvalu or Bangladesh are already feeling the impacts of climate change, one rarely hears talk of their situation during the plenary sessions of the UN Climate Change Conference. In honor of Human Rights Day, which was yesterday, let's take a closer look at human rights in the context of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

In Okhla, India, an incinerator project has been registered for CDM credits. This is despite active opposition to the project by the local community because of the high level of dioxins that are emitted from incineration. In fact, this incinerator had been shut down in 2001 due to poor perfromance. And yes, I know what you are thinking - how can an incinerator project be considered clean? Well, the CDM doesn't actaully define what "sustainable development" is - the host country does.

The Changuinola Dam in Panama is another example of a project applying for CDM credits with clear human right violations. In addition to destroying riverine and forest ecosystems in one of the world's biodiversity hotspots, the La Amistad UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, 1,000 Ngobe people were forcibly removed from their homes. Even the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and indigenous people has criticized the project on these grounds. Security guards hired by the project developer, AES, and the police have been responsible for beatings, arbitrary detention, public humiliation, threats and illegal destruction of crops and homes.

Perhaps the CDM Executive Board thought that their goals were human rights abuses and environmental destruction, instead of emissions reductions and sustainable development. In that case, their track record would be stellar.