learn more about:User login |
Follow-Up Letter to CSG Regarding Project Risks in Southeast AsiaJune 22, 2009
Mr. Zhao Jianguo, 22 June 2009 Re: CSG Project Risks in Southeast Asia To Director Zhao: International Rivers is a US-based civil society organization that works globally to protect rivers and the people that depend on them, and to promote sustainable solutions for meeting water, energy, and flood management needs. In May 2008, we wrote to you regarding projects that CSG is pursuing in Burma, Laos, and Cambodia. We raised a number of outstanding concerns with these projects, which we identified as needing to be addressed before CSG proceeds with its initial public offering. We offered recommendations on how CSG can reduce the environmental and social impacts of these projects, decrease project risks, ensure compliance with relevant Chinese and international law, and advance CSG's global reputation. We have also contacted Sinohydro expressing similar concerns with overseas dams, and have received a helpful response from Sinohydro's overseas department. We have yet to hear from you regarding our recommendations, and we remain concerned that CSG's hydropower projects are having or will have a negative impact on local communities and the environment. According to CSRC and MEP guidelines, CSG is required to undertake a public review of the environmental impacts of its operations before listing, during which time the company's overseas investments should be analyzed. We will continue to voice our concerns about these projects in which CSG is involved overseas as part of this review process. Specific concerns are as follows:
We offer the following recommendations regarding how CSG can ensure compliance with Chinese domestic laws, strengthen its relations with project host communities abroad, and establish world class social and environmental standards that can safeguard against conflicts in future overseas projects. First, we ask that CSG reconsider its involvement in the above-mentioned projects. Given that the impacts associated with the Sambor, Stung Cheay Areng, Myitsone, and Salween hydropower projects are severe and cannot be mitigated, CSG should not move forward with these projects. For the Nam Tha 1 project, CSG should instigate an independent study of the project's economic and technical feasibility as well as a participatory social and environmental impact study to determine whether the project should proceed. With regards to the Shweli 1 project, CSG should ensure that affected people receive fair compensation for their losses and share in the project's benefits and that participatory social and environmental impact studies are conducted for two additional dams proposed on the Shweli River. Second, we ask that CSG adopt and follow environmental, social, safety and health standards in all of its overseas dam development projects that meet international standards of best practice. This will allow CSG to identify and address potential problems at an early stage, and will help avoid negative impacts, potential conflicts with affected communities, delays, and a tainted reputation during the implementation of projects. We recommend CSG develop its policies inline with the framework of the World Commission on Dams, the leading benchmark for corporate social responsibility in the hydropower sector.5 We provided details to you about the recommendations of the World Commission on Dams in our May 2008 letter. We would be happy to provide you with additional guidance, as well as a copy of the World Commission on Dams final report: "Dams and Development, a New Framework for Decision Making." Third, we recommend that CSG engage in a dialogue with host communities and civil society organizations in overseas regions in which it is active. Harmonious relations with host communities and with civil society are an essential factor in the successful implementation of international infrastructure projects. Host communities and civil society groups are often the first to know about the social and environmental problems which may arise in complex projects. An open dialogue with host communities and civil society will support the quality of CSG's construction projects, ensure friendly relations with the host populations, and contribute towards the company's effort to become a leading international brand. These three recommendations would help China Southern Power Grid Company ensure compliance with relevant Chinese domestic policy, including the State Council's "Nine Principles on Encouraging and Standardizing Foreign Investment", SASAC's "Guidelines on Fulfilling Social Responsibility by Central Enterprises," and the Ministry of Environmental Protection's Green Credit Policy. I would be glad to discuss with you how CSG's environmental policy could be strengthened, how to engage with host communities and civil society organizations, and the project-specific concerns either through further correspondence or in a personal meeting. I will be in China mid-June through mid-July, 2009, should you wish to schedule an in-person meeting. We look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Peter Bosshard,
Attachments:
Endorsed by:
cc: 1 Burma Rivers Network, 2007. Damming the Irrawaddy, available online. 2 See case study on the Nam Tha project, in Power Surge: the Impacts of Rapid Dam Development in Laos, September 2008, International Rivers, p. 25. 3 See proceedings of Mekong River Commission Secretariat expert group
4 See www.savethemekong.org and http://tinyurl.com/Save-the-Mekong
Contact us: Peter Bosshard Carl Middleton
|