Community History of Inga 1 and Inga 2
According to Mr. Simon Malanda, representative of the displaced communities, the Inga site was inhabited by families from six clans who were forced to leave the site in 1920 under Belgian colonial orders. However, the project did not move forward for more than 30 years. In 1954-55, the Belgian authorities undertook a population survey of the site in order to know if people were still living in, or had returned to, the site.
Mr. Malanda’s uncle, Mr. Ferdinand Sona, was recruited by the project planners to assist in the survey. After the survey was completed, Mr. Ferdinand led a community effort seeking compensation for the displaced communities. In 1958, an agreement with the Belgian colonial authorities was reached for a lump sum of 781,000 Belgian francs to be paid to the displaced communities. This was not paid prior to Congo's independence. Since independence neither the Congolese government nor SNEL, the state utility which oversees Inga, has paid any compensation to the communities. The communities report having never received any financial or in-kind compensation.
When Mr. Sona died, Mr. Malanda took over efforts to have the community claim fulfilled. Several correspondences with SNEL dating back to 1970 show a history of discussion regarding the claim and desire by the communities to ensure that the compensation was paid and that a revenue sharing scheme was put in place.
1970, SNEL wrote to Mr. Malanda that the claim would be included in the 1971
budget. SNEL did not fulfill its agreement. The communities twice engaged a lawyer on their behalf, in 1975 and
more recently in 2006. In 1975, a lawyer for the communities submitted their
claim to the high court in
The six clans were absorbed into 12 pre-existing villages and
one new village (Lubwaku, meaning “thrown away”) around the area. In addition,
The population of
The affected communities have organized themselves into two committees. There is a committee of the 6 clans and a second committee
which embodies the 6 clans plus the community of former workers now settled at
The claims of the communities include the following:
- Payment for the displacement compensation (the amount would need to be negotiated to consider that the original amount was probably inadequate at the time, inflation, rise in property value, and possibly a penalty for not paying compensation at the original time)
- Preferential access to jobs for community members
- Electrification of all affected communities (this is complicated by more resettlement)
- A benefit sharing mechanism which would provide an annual dividend to the communities
- A “modern city” with schools, health care, roads, internet and other infrastructure.