How Chinese Loans Could Fuel Regional Conflict in East Africa

By: 
Peter Bosshard
Omo Valley warrior
Omo Valley man with Kalashnikov
Alison M. Jones for www.nowater-nolife.org

China has made great efforts to support poverty reduction in Africa, and likes to present itself as a friend of the African people. A new report warns that its loans for the Gibe III Dam and irrigation projects on the Omo River now threaten to pull China into an explosive regional conflict between well-armed groups in Kenya, Ethiopia and South Sudan.

We have covered the looming impacts of the Gibe III Dam and the sugar plantations that are linked to it on the fragile ecosystems of the Lower Omo Valley and Lake Turkana and the 500,000 indigenous people who depend on them in this blog for several years. A new scientific study which International Rivers has just published explores the social and environmental impacts of the project in more detail, and examines the knock-on effects of the impending ecological crisis on the security of the volatile border region of Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Sudan.

Based on a report prepared by hydrologist Sean Avery for the African Studies Centre of Oxford University, the paper analyzes how the dam and sugar plantations will affect the unique ecosystems of the Lower Omo Valley and Lake Turkana. The dam will interrupt the annual flood of the Omo River, which sustains the agriculture, grazing lands and fisheries of the region. The filling of the Gibe III reservoir will lower the water level of Lake Turkana by 2 meters. The sugar plantations will divert at least 28 percent of the Omo River’s annual flow, and lower the lake’s water level by at least 13 meters.

With a more realistic assessment of the water demand of the plantations, the African Studies Centre report estimates that Lake Turkana will lose more than half of its current volume, and its water level will drop by 22 meters. This could split the lake in two, and would likely turn the water in the Southern half so saline that it becomes undrinkable. The new paper concludes that “the long-term effect will parallel what has happened to the Aral Sea in Central Asia,” which was almost sucked dry by cotton plantations, turning the region into a toxic wasteland.

Along the shores of Lake Turkana
Along the shores of Lake Turkana
Alison M. Jones for www.nowater-nolife.org

The indigenous peoples of the Lower Omo Valley and Lake Turkana are extremely poor, but well-armed. They have a long history of resource conflicts over water, fisheries, and grazing land. According to the new report, these conflicts will escalate and may spiral out of control if the dam and irrigation projects are completed.

The report warns: “Local groups displaced from their livelihoods and homelands will seek out resources on the lands of their neighbors in the Kenya-Ethiopia-Sudan borderlands. Based on the recent history of conflict among local communities in this region, they can be expected to react largely through raids and warfare. Well-armed, primed by past grudges, and often divided by support from different state and local governments, these conflicts can be expected to be bloody and persistent. In fact they are already underway.”

Once the projects are completed, the Northern shore of Lake Turkana will retreat from Ethiopia into Kenya. Peoples such as the Dassanech will have to follow the shoreline into Kenya in order maintain their access to the lake. The shrinking of Lake Turkana will also remove a buffer between the peoples of the Western shore, particularly the Turkana, and inhabitants of the adjacent shore such as the Gabbra.

Such migrations and conflicts will likely push people into the disputed Ilemi Triangle between Kenya, South Sudan and Ethiopia, across the Ugandan border, and into the Borana region east of Lake Turkana. Groups of displaced people will also seek refuge in urban slums and rural famine camps, which will breed their own violence and despair. The author warns of “inflamed cross-border tensions” between Kenya and Ethiopia at a time when oil has been found near Lake Turkana, and when Ethiopia is looking for better integration with Kenya for access to the sea.

After 2006, the Ethiopian government tried to raise funds for the multi-billion dollar projects on the Omo River from the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and other international financiers for several years. Due to the controversy, none of these funders got involved. Only the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) stepped forward and in August 2010 approved a loan for a Chinese $500 million turbine contract for the Gibe III Dam. In September 2012, the China Development Bank (CDB) signed a memorandum of understanding with the Ethiopia Sugar Corporation for another loan of $500 million for the construction of sugar factories in the Lower Omo Valley.

The Gibe III Dam and the sugar plantations will threaten World Heritage Sites in the Lower Omo Valley and near Lake Turkana. In June 2011, the UN World Heritage Committee called on the Ethiopian government to “immediately halt all construction” on the dam, and encouraged the Chinese financiers “to put on hold their financial support” until the Committee’s next annual meeting in June 2012. Neither the Ethiopian government nor ICBC heeded this call.

Ethiopia is an important friend and partner of China – but so is Kenya. Once the dam and irrigation projects are complete, China may find itself at the center of an escalating conflict, which does not serve its interests in the region. “The destruction of Turkana, if it proceeds, will become as notorious as that of the Aral Sea, tainting all those who perpetuate it,” the scientific paper warns.

The completion of the multi-billion dollar project in the Lower Omo Valley depends on international funding. Neither ICBC nor the CDB have so far disbursed their loans. Now that the likely social, environmental and security impacts of the projects have become evident, the Chinese government should reconsider its interests in the region, and ask its banks to withdraw their support for a social and environmental disaster in the making.

An extended version of this commentary appeared, in English and Chinese, on chinadialogue.


Comments

Peter, Peter, we know you are our enemy. You will not be able to keep us poor and starving. Richard Leakey and other colonial left overs have a vested interest in keeping Africa poor and miserable to keep their way of life. Thank God now we know how the game is played. We will do whatever it takes to defeat poverty and feed our people. If that involves killing a few bugs, be it. In the past, Europeans came to Africa with a bible on their hands and stole our land over night. Now the second generation Europeans like Bosshard and Leakey have come as Environmentalists to steal our land and other resources for the second time. Not Again!!!!

I am a native of South Omo, Ethiopia.
What the writer has scribbled in this article is totally fictitious and totally nonsense , a racist view wishing and condemning us to live in primitive state.

Dear Writer
In the International Rivers staff introductory it is vividly mentioned that your favorite river is the Albula in the Swiss Alps. I take this granted and no wonder for a Swiss .
No wonder too Gibe river in Ethiopia is not your favorite because you are not the native . For this reason no wonder if you always disseminate evil and nonsense propaganda as an alien .
For me My favorite river is Gibe and Omo . It is my soul and blood. It is the Gift of God for my people .
Long live Ethiopia !
Long live Africa !

Mr. Peter Bossard

1. Electricity generated in your tiny country (Switzerland) is 56% from hydroelectricity and 39% from nuclear power - So why do I not see you campaigning against this - and lit your home with candle light to look exemplary ?
2. Contrarily my country (Ethiopia) is geographically and population wise is emencly big than your country - with very small of electricity production so far - you look to be unusually busy in propagating evil agenda to disrupt my country's people effort to generate electricity with own rivers resources. Several million peoples in my country are in dark , in poverty - and you people out there simply give negative criticisms without even droping a solution . By the way what you profess is your own organizations policy . You have no the knowledge or mandate to profess my country's people needs and wants.

Mago D.
T. G . Secondary School , South Omo, Ethiopia

While we wish that Ethiopian critics had the same right to express themselves, we welcome the debate on the dam building plans in the Omo Valley. I also appreciate the interest in the power sector of my home country, Switzerland. Like Ethiopia, Switzerland has many steep river valleys that can be utilized for hydropower generation. Yet Switzerland also has a culture of local participation in decision-making and freedom of speech. Local communities and environmental activists have stopped several dams that would have displaced thousands of people and destroyed fragile ecosystems. This has forced Swiss power utilities to prioritize projects with limited social and environmental impacts. Ethiopia would benefit from a similar approach. Unlike Switzerland, Ethiopia has a huge potential of wind, geothermal and solar power. In many regions, these technologies can bring electricity to rural communities more cheaply than centralized, grid-based hydropower projects. Even though industrialized countries developed their phone systems based on landlines, Ethiopians were right to expand access to telecommunication through the new mobile technologies. Likewise, Ethiopia should make use of the full specter of modern energy technologies even though industrialized countries relied heavily on centralized power systems.

Mr. Peter Bossard

We know what is good for our country - and do not need at all your interference in our own affairs - simple as that !!!!

Mago D.
T. G . Secondary School , South Omo, Ethiopia

On a number of occasions , I have read the articles posted on this web site.

We see too the self made group's unfair campaign against African projects to dry up financial sources of African and developing countries projects . This group reflect their "organization'" view , and not at all the natives peoples interest. This is not only unfair but comparable to "Crime On Humanity."

Are the donors/financiers of this group really know going on ? I hope not !!

T. Bikal
Ankara University
Turkey

I too am from Ethiopia. I adore the Omo River and the people along it. The Hamer, the Suri and Tsemay. However, we Ethiopians are looking for a quick fix for energy, economic growth and development. As a result, we are being short sighted and not considering the future consequences of these massive projects. Thus, I agree there needs to be extensive environmental and social impact analysis. Most importantly, the voices of the people need to be heard before the construction of such a project. As far as I know, the Ethiopian government is doing neither. No one is going to the local communities and is asking them where they stand on this issue, whether or not they are ready for its enormous impact and provide assistance accordingly. Whether many of us agree with it or not is not the question/issue. The issue here is, multiple lives and livelihoods are going to be affected, but no one seems to actually take action in standing up for these vast and unique communities so that their voices could be heard.

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Facebook

Twitter

Mailing lists

We offer many campaign-specific email lists to help you stay informed.

Sign up for urgent campaign actions and NewsStream: